Hp

Eight Punjab, Himachal oppose all-India judicial service: The Tribune India

Satya Prakash

Tribune press service

New Delhi, December 12

A total of 13 high courts and eight states, including Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, opposed the idea of ​​having an All-Indian Judicial Service (AIJS) even though Haryana and Mizoram supported it. .

“In view of the existing differences of opinion among the stakeholders, the government is engaged in a process of consultation with the stakeholders to reach a common ground,” the Minister of Justice of the Lok Sabha told Lok Sabha. ‘Union, Kiren Rijiju.

Consultation in progress

In view of the existing differences of opinion among stakeholders, the government has embarked on a process of consultation with stakeholders to reach common ground. —Kiren Rijiju, Minister of Legal Affairs

However, the government argued that a properly framed AIJS was important to strengthen the overall justice delivery system, as it would provide the opportunity to induce new and suitably qualified legal talent selected through a screening system. on appropriate merit for all of India, as well as addressing the issue of social inclusion by enabling appropriate representation of marginalized and disadvantaged sections of society.

According to a written response given by the justice minister on Friday, Haryana and Mizoram were the only states favorable to AIJS. “The proposal appears to be justified,” Haryana maintained.

Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh were not in favor of AIJS, while Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Manipur, Orissa and Uttarakhand wanted some changes in the proposal.

The government of Punjab said: “The state is not in favor of establishing AIJS. The Himachal government said: “Given the realities on the ground, it will not be appropriate to have a judicial service all over India. As such, the state is not in its favor.

Thirteen states – Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, West Bengal, Telangana, Goa, Sikkim and Tripura – had not yet taken a position on the issue.

Among the high courts, those of Sikkim and Tripura were favorable. Thirteen HCs, including those in Bombay, Delhi, Calcutta and Madras, were against, while six others wanted changes in the proposal.

Two other CS had not yet responded. The Patna High Court said judicial services could not be compared to public services, while the Punjab & Haryana and Calcutta HCs said AIJS would be against federalism.


Source link